The following prescribing information is based on official labeling in effect July 2000.
Caution: Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician (or properly licensed practitioner).
Apligraf is supplied as a living, bi-layered skin substitute: the epidermal layer is formed by human keratinocytes and has a well-differentiated stratum corneum; the dermal layer is composed of human fibroblasts in a bovine Type I collagen lattice. While matrix proteins and cytokines found in human skin are present in Apligraf, Apligraf does not contain Langerhans cells, melanocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, blood vessels or hair follicles. In a 10 patient venous leg ulcer study to determine the longevity of Apligraf cells, 2 of 8 patients evaluated at 4 weeks demonstrated Apligraf DNA. Neither of these patients showed Apligraf DNA at 8 weeks.
Apligraf is manufactured under aseptic conditions from human neonatal male foreskin tissue. The fibroblast and keratinocyte cell banks which are the source of the cells from which Apligraf is derived are tested for human and animal viruses, retroviruses, bacteria, fungi, yeast, mycoplasma, karyology, isoenzymes, and tumorigenicity. The final product is tested for morphology, cell viability, epidermal coverage, sterility, mycoplasma, and physical container integrity. Product manufacture also includes reagents derived from animal materials including bovine pituitary extract. All animal derived reagents are tested for viruses, retroviruses, bacteria, fungi, yeast, and mycoplasma before use, and all bovine material is obtained from countries free from bovine spongioform encephalopathy (BSE).
Apligraf is indicated for use with standard therapeutic compression for the treatment of non-infected partial and full-thickness skin ulcers due to venous insufficiency of greater than 1 month duration and which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy.
Apligraf is also indicated for use with standard diabetic foot ulcer care for the treatment of full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers of greater than three weeks duration which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy and which extend through the dermis but without tendon, muscle, capsule or bone exposure.
Warning:
|
DO NOT OPEN AND DO NOT USE Apligraf after the expiration date or if the pH is not within the acceptable range (6.8-7.7) as determined by the provided color chart (Section 9).
|
Warning:
|
Allergic reactions to the components in the Apligraf agarose shipping medium (Section 8) and bovine collagen, (a component of Apligraf), have been reported. Discontinue product use if a patient shows evidence of an immunologic reaction. Patients should notify their physician of any symptoms of an allergic reaction. In clinical studies evaluating over 1000 patients, no allergic reactions to Apligraf were reported. |
Caution:
|
Do not use Apligraf if there is evidence of container damage or product contamination.
|
Caution:
|
Apligraf should not be reused, frozen or sterilized after opening.
|
Caution:
|
Apligraf should be kept in its tray on the shipping medium in the sealed bag under controlled temperature (20°C-31°C) until ready for use.
|
Caution:
|
Caution:
|
Do not use cytotoxic agents, including Dakin' solution, Mafenide Acetate, Scarlet Red Dressing, Tincoban, Zinc Sulfate, Povidone-iodine solution, or Chlorhexidine with Apligraf. In
in vitro
and
in vivo
histology studies, exposure to these agents degraded Apligraf. Device exposure to Mafenide Acetate, Polymyxin/Nystatin or Dakin' Solution also reduced Apligraf cell viability.
|
Caution:
|
Diagnosis of wound infection may be complicated by the white or yellow appearance of Apligraf after it becomes hydrated with wound fluid. Apligraf-treated wounds with respect to signs of suspected infection, including a change from baseline at the ulcer site for pain, edema, erythema, drainage, odor, warmth and/or unexplained fever, should be evaluated and treated according to standard practice for infection.
|
Caution:
|
The persistence of Apligraf cells on the wound and the safety of this device in venous ulcer patients beyond one year and in diabetic foot ulcer patients beyond 6 months has not been evaluated. Testing to date has not revealed a tumorigenic potential of the cells contained in the device. However, the long term potential of skin cancers from these cells is unknown.
|
Caution:
|
The safety and the effectiveness of Apligraf have not been established for patients receiving greater than 5 device applications. |
All reported adverse events, which occurred in the Apligraf cohort in the study evaluating Apligraf for the treatment of venous leg ulcers at an incidence of 1% or greater are listed in Table 1. The adverse events are listed in descending order according to frequency. This table lists all adverse events reported in the VLU study including those attributed and not attributed to treatment.
|
Adverse events were recorded as mild, moderate, severe or life-threatening. In the venous leg ulcer study, there were 1 life-threatening and 3 severe infections reported in the Apligraf group and none in the control arm. Of the four events, two severe infections were considered related to treatment: however one occurred one month after the last application of Apligraf and the other occurred following application on a pre-existing Pseudomonas infection
All reported adverse events, which occurred in the study evaluating Apligraf for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers at an incidence of 1% or greater in the Apligraf group are listed in Table 2. This table lists all adverse events reported in the DFU study including those attributed and not attributed to treatment.
|
Table 3 lists all DFU infectious adverse events (i.e., wound infection, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, gangrene, abscess, and fungal infection) as well as resections and amputations occurring on the study limb by first occurrence.
|
A prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center, multi-specialty, unmasked study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Apligraf and compression therapy in comparison to an active treatment concurrent control of zinc paste gauze and compression therapy. The study population included consenting patients who were 18-89 years old, available for one year follow-up, with venous insufficiency confirmed by plethysmography (venous reflux < 20 sec.); associated with non-infected partial and/or full thickness skin loss ulcer (IAET Stage 2 or 3) of greater than one month duration and which had not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy. Patients were excluded for ankle brachial index < 0.65, severe rheumatoid arthritis, collagen vascular disease, pregnancy/lactation, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, ulcer with necrotic, avascular or bone/tendon/fascia exposed-bed, clinically significant wound healing impairment due to uncontrolled diabetes, or renal, hepatic, hematologic, neurologic or immune insufficiency or due to immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids (> 15 mg/day), radiation therapy or chemotherapy; or enrollment in studies within the past 30 days for investigational devices or within the past three months for investigational drugs related to wound healing.
Extremities with multiple ulcers were enrolled; however, only one ulcer per extremity was studied. Non-study ulcer care was not specifically defined. Study ulcer care was defined for the treatment (Apligraf and compression therapy) and control (zinc paste gauze and compression therapy), treatment groups in two phases:
Wound closure was defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage and assessed by clinical observation at visits on day 0, day 3-5, weekly from weeks 1-8, months 3 and 6 after initial treatment application or until wound closure was achieved. Additional follow-up visits were 9 and 12 months after initial treatment.
The incidence of VLU wound closure at set visits up to 6 months is presented below as the raw data results (Figure 1) and the results after adjustment for pooled center, baseline ulcer duration, and baseline area (Figure 2).
![]() |
![]() |
At six months, the incidence of VLU recurrence was 8.3% (6/72) for Apligraf- and 7.4% (4/54) for control-treated patients. The incidence of VLU recurrence by 12 months was 18.1% (13/72) in the Apligraf group and 22.2% (12/54) in the control group.
In the VLU effectiveness cohort, there were 33/130 (25.4%) Apligraf-treated and 15/110 (13.6%) control-treated ulcers with suspected wound infection. While the overall incidence of wound infection was higher in the Apligraf arm, the incidence of wound closure (Figures 1 and 2) was also higher for Apligraf-treated patients.
The impact of VLU patient baseline status on wound closure was evaluated for the patient populations above and below the median values for ulcer duration and ulcer size as well as for baseline IAET Ulcer Stage, the presence of diabetes and a patient' Ankle Brachial Index. The results of these analyses are displayed in Table 4.
|
Clinical assessment (scale 1-4) of wound depth (IAET staging), erythema, edema, wound pain, fibrin, exudate, granulation tissue, and overall assessment by changes in mean score and analysis of variance from baseline to the 6 month visit indicated no differences between VLU treatment groups at 6 months.
In tests of VLU patients' sera there were no observations of antibody responses against bovine Type I collagen, bovine serum proteins or the Class I HLA antigens on human dermal fibroblasts, and human epidermal cells. T-cell specific responses were also not observed against bovine Type I collagen, human fibroblasts or human keratinocytes. There was also no clinical evidence of Apligraf rejection by any patient.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center unmasked study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Apligraf in comparison to Control treatment, saline moistened gauze in the treatment of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. The study population included consenting patients who were between 18 and 80 years old, with a 0.4 cm 2 -16.3 cm 2 full-thickness foot ulcer of neuropathic etiology of at least 2 weeks duration, located on the plantar, medial or lateral surface of the foot at least 2 cm away from any other ulcers on the same extremity. The study participants were required to be diagnosed diabetics with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, a HbA1C between 6% and 12% and available for six-month follow-up. Patients were excluded for ulcers with tracts or tunnels, a clinical infection at the study ulcer site, ABI < 0.65, active Charcot' arthropathy at the study extremity, a study ulcer that healed > 30% from post-debridement at Study Day -7 to Day 0, renal dialysis, history of alcohol or substance abuse within one year, acute or chronic hepatitis, receiving corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, radiation therapy or chemotherapy one month prior to study enrollment, or enrollment in clinical studies evaluating a device within the past 30 days or within the past 3 months for pharmaceuticals or biologics.
Two-hundred-seventy-seven patients were entered into the screening phase of the study. Sixty-nine patients did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. After randomization and screening, 208 patients were treated in the study, i.e., 112 received Apligraf and 96 received Control therapy. Patients received 12 weeks of treatment and 3 additional months of follow-up. Complete wound closure was evaluated by or on 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated weekly for the first 12 weeks with mid-week visits for dressing changes from Day 0 through Week 5 and follow-up visits at Months 4, 5 and 6.
Both treatment groups received good ulcer care consisting of sharp debridement, saline moistened dressings and a non-weight bearing regimen. All patients in the Apligraf treatment group received Apligraf at Day 0. At Study Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4, if Apligraf coverage was less than 100% and the wound was not progressing to healing then an additional Apligraf unit was applied. A maximum of 5 Apligraf applications was allowed. The Apligraf was dressed with saline-moistened non-adherent dressing, tape, dry gauze, petrolatum gauze and gauze wrap. The Control treated patients received saline-moistened non-adherent dressing, tape, saline moistened gauze, dry gauze, petrolatum gauze and gauze wrap from Day 0 through Study Week 4.
Patients in both treatment groups who did not heal by Study Week 5 were treated with saline-moistened gauze, dry gauze, petrolatum gauze and gauze wrap from Study Week 5 through Study Week 12. The patients were instructed to change this dressing two times per day.
Patients were instructed to avoid weight bearing on the affected foot throughout the duration of the study. During the first 6 weeks patients were instructed to use crutches or a wheelchair. Each patient was fitted with a customized tri-density sandal. These sandals were to be worn through-out the entire study.
In keeping with good medical practice, early detection and treatment of ulcer infection using standard procedures was advised.
The incidence of DFU wound closure at set visits is presented below (Figure 3).
![]() |
The incidence of DFU recurrence as a function of device applications is presented in Table 5.
|
The impact of DFU patient baseline status on wound closure was evaluated for patient gender, age, Charcot' status, diabetes type, number and location of ulcers on study foot as well as the patient populations above and below the median values for ulcer duration, size and HbA 1c level (%). The results of these analyses are displayed in Table 6.
|
Between Study Day 0 and Study Week 12, both DFU Apligraf and Control groups showed statistically significant improvement in undermining, maceration, exudate, granulation, eschar and fibrin slough. At Study Week 12, Apligraf showed statistically significant improvements when compared to Control in maceration (p=0.0233), exudate (p=0.0290) and eschar (p=0.0293).
In tests of DFU patients' sera there were no observations of antibody responses against bovine Type I collagen, bovine serum proteins or Class I HLA antigens on human dermal fibroblasts, and human epidermal cells. T-cell specific responses were not observed against bovine Type I collagen, human dermal fibroblasts or human keratinocytes. In addition, there was no clinical evidence of Apligraf rejection by any patient.
Apligraf is supplied sealed in a heavy gauge polyethylene bag with a 10% CO 2 /air atmosphere and agarose nutrient medium, ready for single use. To maintain cell viability, Apligraf should be kept in the sealed bag at 20°C-31°C until use. Apligraf is supplied as a circular disk approximately 75 mm in diameter and 0.75 mm thick. The agarose shipping medium contains agarose, L-glutamine, hydrocortisone/bovine serum albumin, bovine insulin, human transferrin, triiodothyronine, ethanolamine, O-phosphorylethanolamine, adenine, selenious acid, DMEM powder, HAM's F-12 powder, sodium bicarbonate, calcium chloride, and water for injection.
To maintain cell viability, the product is aseptically manufactured, but not terminally sterilized. Apligraf is shipped following a preliminary sterility test with a 48 hour incubation to determine the absence of microbial growth. Final (14 day incubation) sterility tests results are not available at the time of application.
![]() |
Apligraf is indicated for use with standard therapeutic compression for the treatment of non-infected partial and full-thickness skin ulcers due to venous insufficiency of greater than 1 month duration and which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy. Apligraf is also indicated for use in the treatment of full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers of neuropathic etiology of at least three weeks duration which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy and which extend through the dermis but without tendon, muscle, capsule or bone exposure, and are located on the plantar, medial or lateral area of the foot, excluding the heel. Apligraf consists of living cells which must be kept sealed in its nutrient medium and 10% CO 2 /air atmosphere under controlled temperature (20°C-31°C) and used within 15 minutes of opening.
Venous Leg Ulcers
Secure Apligraf with a three-layer dressing so as to assure contact to wound bed:
Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Apligraf should be dressed with non-adherent saline moistened dressing, a layer of dry gauze, a layer of petrolatum gauze and gauze wrap.
Venous Leg Ulcers
Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Venous Leg Ulcers
A brochure will be made available to:
Diabetic Foot Ulcers
A brochure will be made available to:
Remove the peel-off label from the lower right corner of the Apligraf package label and place it in the patient' chart. This label bears a unique lot number and expiration date of the Apligraf.
Numbers in parentheses ( ) refer to sections in the main part of the product labeling.
Apligraf is supplied as a living, bi-layered skin substitute manufactured using neonatal foreskin keratinocytes and fibroblasts with bovine Type I collagen. (1)
Apligraf is indicated for use with standard therapeutic compression in the treatment of uninfected partial and/or full-thickness skin loss ulcers due to venous insufficiency of greater than 1 month duration and which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy. (2)
Apligraf is indicated for use with standard diabetic foot ulcer care for the treatment of full-thickness foot ulcers of neuropathic etiology of at least three weeks duration, which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy and extend through the dermis but without tendon, muscle, capsule or bone exposure. (2)
Apligraf is contraindicated for use on clinically infected wounds and in patients with known allergies to bovine collagen or hypersensitivity to the components of the shipping medium. (3, 4, 5, 8)
If the expiration date or product pH (6.8-7.7) is not within the acceptable range DO NOT OPEN AND DO NOT USE the product. A clinical determination of wound infection should be made based on all of the signs and symptoms of infection. (4, 5)
All reported adverse events, which occurred at an incidence of greater than 1% in the clinical studies are listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. These tables list adverse events both attributed and not attributed to treatment. (6)
Apligraf has been processed under aseptic conditions and should be handled observing sterile technique. It should be kept in its tray on the medium in the sealed bag under controlled temperature (20°C-31°C) until ready for use. Apligraf should be placed on the wound bed within 15 minutes of opening the package. Handling before application to the wound site should be minimal. If there is any question that Apligraf may be contaminated or compromised, it should not be used. Apligraf should not be used beyond the listed expiration date. (9)
The safety and effectiveness of Apligraf has not been established in pregnant women, acute wounds, burns and ulcers caused by pressure.
VLU patients should be counseled regarding the importance of complying with compression therapy or other treatment, which may be prescribed in conjunction with Apligraf.
DFU patients should be counseled that: Apligraf is used in combination with good ulcer care including a non-weight bearing regimen and optimal metabolic control and nutrition. Once an ulcer has healed, ulcer prevention practices should be implemented including regular visits to appropriate medical providers.
Apligraf does not address the underlying pathophysiology of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Management of the patient' diabetes should be according to standard medical practice.
Apligraf is supplied sealed in a heavy gauge polyethylene bag with a 10% CO 2 /air atmosphere and agarose nutrient medium, ready for single use. To maintain cell viability, Apligraf should be kept in the sealed bag at 20°C-31°C until use. Apligraf is supplied as a circular disk approximately 75 mm in diameter and 0.75 mm thick. (8)
Manufactured by:
Organogenesis Inc.
Canton, MA 02021
Marketed and Distributed by:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
©2000 Novartis
T2000-42
USA-Z03
REV: JUNE 2000 300-111-2